The public has an opinion on ALPR cameras.
This is an independent look at those opinions.

1,435 U.S. adults were surveyed on how police use automated license plate readers (ALPR) - what they'll accept, what they won't and what would change their minds. The results don't split cleanly by political opinion, and they point to a clear governance fix.

Public Opinions on ALPR Usage

The Numbers

54.4%
oppose police ALPR use in their community.
34.6%
support the usage of ALPR by police.
11%
are undecided

Purpose and governance drive public opinion about the use of ALPR

Police license plate reader use is judged almost entirely by purpose, with narrow, high-stakes applications like finding missing children accepted far more readily than broad or ongoing uses. Public messaging campaigns do little to shift opinion, but concrete governance commitments, like independent audits, documented search reasons, and public reporting, meaningfully increase support. On data handling, the public consistently favors narrow, time-limited retention paired with regular, transparent reporting on how the technology is used. 

Findings from this survey

Acceptability of ALPR usage turns almost entirely on purpose, running from 88.3% of respondents who accept using the cameras to find missing or abducted children down to 17.7% who accept using them to monitor protests, a spread of 70.6 points.
Age divides respondents more than race, ethnicity, or sex, with opposition falling 27 points from 67.6% among those aged 25 to 34 to 40.6% among those aged 65 and over, the only age band in which supporters outnumber opponents.

Respondents asked for oversight before prohibition, with 41.8% choosing independent external audits as the measure that would most raise their confidence and 57.5% saying their support would increase if their department adopted the safeguards they had picked.

Messaging does not move these views but governance does: accurate one-sided framing shifted policy preference by only -4.4 and +3.0 percentage points, while 57.5% of respondents said adopting their chosen safeguards would raise their support against 2.9% who said it would lower it.
11.6% of respondents said concerns about these cameras had affected where they drove or whether they went somewhere in the past year.

Access the Survey Findings