The public has an opinion on ALPR cameras.
This is an independent look at those opinions.
1,435 U.S. adults were surveyed on how police use automated license plate readers (ALPR) - what they'll accept, what they won't and what would change their minds. The results don't split cleanly by political opinion, and they point to a clear governance fix.
Public Opinions on ALPR Usage
The Numbers
Purpose and governance drive public opinion about the use of ALPR
Police license plate reader use is judged almost entirely by purpose, with narrow, high-stakes applications like finding missing children accepted far more readily than broad or ongoing uses. Public messaging campaigns do little to shift opinion, but concrete governance commitments, like independent audits, documented search reasons, and public reporting, meaningfully increase support. On data handling, the public consistently favors narrow, time-limited retention paired with regular, transparent reporting on how the technology is used.
Findings from this survey
Respondents asked for oversight before prohibition, with 41.8% choosing independent external audits as the measure that would most raise their confidence and 57.5% saying their support would increase if their department adopted the safeguards they had picked.
